Domestic Violence as a Crime Against Humanity: Cultural and Legal Perspectives

Domestic violence is often framed as a private matter – something that happens behind closed doors between two people. But that framing is precisely the problem. Domestic violence is a violation of human rights affecting nearly one in three women globally, cutting across every country, culture, and socioeconomic class. When something is this pervasive, this structurally embedded, and this consistently tolerated by institutions meant to protect people, calling it a “personal” problem is not just inaccurate – it’s dangerous. Understanding domestic violence as a crime against humanity requires us to look beyond individual perpetrators and ask harder questions about the cultures, institutions, and states that allow it to persist.

Understanding domestic violence in cultural context 🔗

Before examining why domestic violence endures globally, it helps to clearly define what it actually encompasses. It is not limited to physical assault. Domestic and family violence includes economic, physical, sexual, emotional, and psychological abuse of adults, children, or elders within a household or intimate relationship. This breadth matters, because the forms of violence that leave no visible bruise – financial control, psychological manipulation, persistent humiliation – are often the most normalized and the hardest to name.

How cultural norms normalize abuse 🔗

In many societies, domestic violence does not look like a crime to the community witnessing it. It looks like discipline, tradition, or a private marital matter. Cross-cultural research shows that intimate partner violence occurs more frequently in societies where conflict is considered commonplace and ideologies of male dominance prevail. When violence is perceived as a normal way to resolve conflict or assert authority, survivors are not just fighting their abusers – they are fighting the entire social framework that tells them this is simply how things are.

The internalization of these norms can be profound. Women in many cultural contexts are taught to be submissive and subservient to male dominance, and are socialized to accept and tolerate violence within marriage. Friends and family often reinforce this, encouraging women to “keep the peace” or “obey” their partners rather than seeking help. This culture of silence is not a local anomaly – it is a documented global pattern. In Kyrgyzstan, for example, women fear physical abuse as punishment for even discussing violence, and even cases of attempted murder by husbands are routinely downgraded to lesser offenses by authorities.

Financial abuse and economic entrapment 🔗

Financial abuse is one of the most effective tools of control, yet it receives far less attention than physical violence. When an abuser controls a partner’s access to money, employment, or financial information, they make leaving structurally impossible. In some patriarchal contexts, husbands can refuse their wives permission to enter the labor force, creating total financial dependence. The result is that women are not simply choosing to stay – they are trapped. Poverty is a primary driver in an abuser’s ability to maintain power and control over a survivor, and this intersection of economic dependency and violence is deliberately engineered, not incidental.

When religion and tradition become shields for abuse 🔗

Cultural justification for domestic violence frequently draws on religious teachings and longstanding tradition. Research involving women from diverse communities found that many survivors turned to religious leaders for help, yet religious frameworks sometimes further normalized the violence and discouraged formal help-seeking. In some communities, the social construction of marriage – and the deep stigma attached to divorce – creates conditions that actively legitimize staying in abusive situations. Marriage practices, limited participation of women in public life, and widespread acceptance of patriarchal attitudes have rendered women structurally vulnerable to domestic violence. When tradition and legal impunity merge, the violence becomes not just tolerated but institutionally protected.

The global and institutionalized nature of domestic violence 🔗

Once we recognize that domestic violence is culturally normalized, the next question is: why don’t institutions stop it? The troubling answer, according to a growing body of feminist scholarship, is that they often don’t just fail to stop it – they actively enable it.

Evelyn Rose and domestic violence as state crime 🔗

Criminologist Evelyn Rose, in her landmark work Domestic Violence as State Crime, makes a direct and well-evidenced argument: there has been a fundamental failure to recognize and address domestic violence as a systemic, institutional, and structural problem. Rose argues that the state is often presented as a neutral arbitrator of harm, but in practice is implicated in domestic violence as an initiator, contributor, and participant. This is not a fringe position. It is backed by evidence drawn from liberal democracies including Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom – countries that position themselves as progressive on gender rights.

Rose’s framework outlines a spectrum of state complicity – from passive bystander to active perpetrator. Domestic violence is not just an individual interpersonal crime but a systematic collective harm which impacts all women and which functions with the wider ideological, political, and policy support of patriarchal states. State complicity can also be understood at a deeper foundational level, through states’ generative role in the institutional and ideological frameworks through which domestic violence occurs.

Structural inequality as the root cause 🔗

This structural analysis extends further. Scholars Rose, Mertens, and Balint argue that domestic and family violence is co-produced by transnational structural forces such as capitalism, neoliberalism, and colonialism, all informed by a patriarchal gender order. It occurs within the state-sanctioned patriarchal institution of the family, making it key for analyzing the intersection of structural forms of violence and the multiple actors involved – nation-states, public and private institutions, and individual perpetrators. In other words, individual abusers do not act in a vacuum. They act within systems that have, over time, produced, legitimized, and sustained the conditions for their violence.

A critical point here is that well-intentioned prevention efforts often miss this. Focusing on changing individual attitudes rather than institutions and substantive structures means targeting the symptoms of inequality, not its root cause. It is not just restrictive gender roles or harmful community attitudes that perpetuate violence against women – it is also substantive structural inequality. Cultural change campaigns aimed only at “attitudes” will never be sufficient as long as legal, economic, and political structures remain unchanged.

When legal systems fail or decriminalize 🔗

The contrast between national legal approaches reveals just how politically determined the response to domestic violence really is. Russia’s 2017 legal reform, which decriminalized certain forms of domestic violence, illustrates the adverse consequences of the absence of a specific legal offense: it reinforces the perception that domestic violence is not a serious crime. International frameworks like the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) call on all states to treat domestic violence as a human rights violation – yet ratifying CEDAW without enforcement mechanisms makes it a symbolic gesture at best.

UN Special Rapporteur Radhika Coomaraswamy declared that a state that does not act against crimes of violence against women is as guilty as the perpetrators, and argued that states must exercise due diligence to ensure enforcement of laws if they wish to avoid such complicity. This “due diligence” standard has now been applied in landmark European Court of Human Rights cases, establishing that states can be held accountable for failing to protect domestic violence victims. The legal framework exists – what is often missing is the political will to apply it.

Impacts beyond the individual: families, communities, and nations 🔗

Treating domestic violence as a private matter ignores an enormous body of evidence showing that its damage extends far beyond the immediate victim. The harm radiates outward – to children, to communities, to economies, and across generations.

The toll on children 🔗

Children in homes where domestic violence occurs are not collateral – they are direct victims. Children who witness domestic violence or are victims of abuse themselves are at serious risk for long-term physical and mental health problems, and those who witness violence between parents may be at greater risk of being violent in their own future relationships. The intergenerational cycle is well-documented: children exposed to domestic violence face a higher risk of psychological, behavioral, and health issues including anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, aggression, and substance abuse.

The economic lifetime cost of childhood exposure to domestic violence tells the same story in different terms. The average lifetime cost derived from a child’s exposure to intimate partner violence is estimated at over $50,000 per victim, due to increased healthcare costs, crime costs, and productivity losses. These are not abstract numbers – they represent entire life trajectories altered by violence that began in what should have been the safest space in a child’s world.

Community-wide consequences 🔗

Domestic violence does not stay behind the front door. The economic burden of domestic violence in the United States alone exceeds $8.3 billion per year, and survivors lose nearly 8 million days of paid work annually, straining employers, healthcare systems, courts, and social services. The CDC estimated direct healthcare costs of domestic violence in the United States at approximately $4.1 billion, with an additional $1.8 billion lost in workplace productivity due to injuries and premature death.

Beyond the financial dimension, domestic violence weakens the social fabric itself. Children who experience abuse perform more poorly in school and carry those outcomes into society, future relationships, and the job market. Homelessness is another direct result of domestic violence, driven by fear, financial pressure, and limited options for survivors. Law enforcement resources are heavily taxed. Emergency services are stretched. And the cycle perpetuates itself as each generation absorbs the normalization of violence they grew up witnessing.

The need for a transnational response 🔗

Globally, domestic violence positions violence against women as a key human rights violation of economic and social urgency, as researchers at the UN Academic Impact have emphasized. Because the structural forces driving domestic violence – patriarchal ideology, economic inequality, colonial legacies, institutional complicity – are themselves transnational in nature, the response must be too. Understanding domestic violence in a global context allows for a comprehensive approach that considers cultural nuances and legal frameworks, and this perspective is crucial for developing more effective prevention and intervention strategies tailored to diverse communities.

Addressing domestic and family violence structurally necessitates that prevention remains connected to local and global feminist and other movements for structural and social justice – including abolitionism, decolonization, and other movements that promote nonviolent, needs-based, and community-based organizing. This is not simply a call for more hotlines or shelters, though those matter enormously. It is a call to confront the systems – economic, legal, cultural, and political – that make domestic violence possible and persistent at scale.

Domestic violence endures not because it is invisible, but because powerful structures have an interest in keeping it private. When intimate partner violence against women involves systematic perpetration of grave harms against a particular social group within the context of state and institutional policy, practice, and ideology that institutes, authorizes, endorses, and is therefore complicit in the harm, the moral and legal case for treating it as a crime against humanity becomes impossible to dismiss. The private is political – and always has been.

What do you think? If domestic violence is a structural and institutional problem rather than simply an individual one, what does meaningful accountability actually look like – for states, for legal systems, and for communities? And how do we address the cultural normalization of abuse without reducing the problem to “attitudes” while ignoring the deeper inequalities that produce it?

References

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12553295/
2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499891/
3. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10666477/
4. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10805967/
5. https://www.safehousecenter.org/the-intersection-of-domestic-violence-and-poverty/
6. https://www.routledge.com/Domestic-Violence-as-State-Crime-A-Feminist-Framework-for-Challenge-and-Change/Rose/p/book/9780367676919
7. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/mono/10.4324/9781003132370-5/domestic-violence-state-crime-humanity-evelyn-rose
8. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10778012231179212
9. https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/sites/default/files/Field%20Office%20ESEAsia/Docs/Publications/2015/03/Domestic%20Violence%20Legislation%20and%20its%20Implementation-CEDAW.pdf
10. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1098&context=njihr
11. https://womenshealth.gov/relationships-and-safety/domestic-violence/effects-domestic-violence-children
12. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11736864/
13. https://centerfordomesticpeace.org/economic-impact-of-domestic-violence/
14. https://www.safealliance.org/blog/ripple-effect-domestic-violence-how-touches-entire-community/
15. https://www.ilcadv.org/societal-impacts-of-domestic-violence/
16. https://bridgesdvc.org/what-impact-does-domestic-violence-have-on-our-communities/
17. https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/examining-domestic-violence-around-world-cost-doing-nothing
18. https://lawslearned.com/international-perspectives-on-domestic-violence/
19. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277539515200118