In India’s journey toward deepening democracy, one piece of legislation stands out for its potential to transform tribal self-governance. The Panchayat Extension to Scheduled Areas Act of 1996, commonly known as PESA, represents a landmark attempt to extend democratic governance to tribal communities while respecting their traditional customs and rights. This Act emerged from the recognition that tribal areas needed a governance structure that honored their unique social fabric while empowering them to control their own development.

Table of Contents

The birth of PESA and its constitutional foundation

When India adopted the 73rd Constitutional Amendment in 1992 to strengthen local governance through Panchayati Raj, scheduled tribal areas were deliberately kept out of its purview. This exclusion was not an oversight but a recognition that tribal communities needed special protections under the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution. However, this created a governance vacuum that PESA was designed to fill.

Enacted on December 24, 1996, PESA extended provisions of the Constitution relating to Panchayats to scheduled areas across ten states with significant tribal populations. These states include Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, and Rajasthan. The Act came into being following recommendations from the Bhuria Committee in 1995, which was tasked with determining how Panchayati Raj structures could function in tribal areas while preserving tribal autonomy.

Empowering Gram Sabhas as the cornerstone of tribal governance

At the heart of PESA lies a radical shift in power dynamics. Unlike the regular Panchayati Raj system where Gram Sabhas have advisory roles, PESA grants them absolute authority in scheduled areas. Every village must have a Gram Sabha consisting of all registered voters, and this body becomes the primary decision-making unit for the community.

Key powers vested in Gram Sabhas

Control over natural resources: PESA empowers Gram Sabhas to manage and control natural resources including land, water, and forests. This includes ownership of minor forest produce, which forms a crucial part of tribal livelihoods. Communities can now manage minor water bodies and have mandatory consultation rights before any land acquisition takes place.

Development planning and implementation: Gram Sabhas must approve all development plans, programs, and projects before implementation. They identify beneficiaries for poverty alleviation schemes and certify the proper utilization of funds, ensuring accountability from the ground up.

Cultural preservation: The Act recognizes the role of Gram Sabhas in safeguarding traditions, customs, cultural identity, and community resources. They also have authority over the customary mode of dispute resolution, allowing communities to maintain their traditional justice systems.

Regulation of social issues: Gram Sabhas can enforce prohibition or regulate the sale and consumption of intoxicants, exercise control over money lending to tribal communities, and prevent land alienation while taking action to restore unlawfully alienated tribal land.

Protecting tribal rights over land and resources

One of PESA’s most significant provisions addresses the historical injustice of land alienation. The Act mandates that any transfer of land in scheduled areas must be approved by the Gram Sabha, providing legal safeguards against exploitation. This protection extends to resource extraction as well. Before granting prospecting licenses or mining leases for minor minerals, state governments must obtain recommendations from the Gram Sabha or Panchayat at the appropriate level.

This provision has proven particularly important given that tribal communities have been steadily losing land in scheduled areas due to threats, coercion, fraud, and indebtedness to money-lenders. PESA empowers Gram Sabhas to prevent such alienation and restore land that has been unlawfully transferred.

Challenges in bringing PESA to life

Despite its progressive vision, PESA’s implementation has faced significant obstacles that have prevented it from achieving its full potential.

Bureaucratic resistance and lack of political will

Perhaps the most formidable challenge has been the reluctance of state governments and bureaucracies to genuinely devolve power to Gram Sabhas. Many experts have asserted that PESA did not deliver due to lack of clarity, legal infirmity, bureaucratic apathy, absence of political will, and resistance to change in the hierarchy of power. Government officials often lack understanding of both the Act’s provisions and tribal culture, leading to inadequate implementation.

Studies have shown that bureaucrats frequently fight against giving Gram Sabhas actual authority, viewing the devolution of power as a threat to existing administrative structures. This resistance manifests in various ways, from delayed implementation to actively undermining Gram Sabha decisions.

Incomplete state-level adoption

PESA requires states to frame their own rules for implementation, but this process has been uneven at best. Some states have yet to frame PESA rules decades after the Act’s passage. Among the ten states with Fifth Schedule areas, Odisha and Jharkhand have not yet enacted PESA Rules. Even in states that have enacted rules, many have diluted PESA’s power by giving bulk of authority to Gram Panchayats rather than Gram Sabhas, contradicting the Act’s core principle.

Lack of awareness among tribal communities

A critical implementation gap exists in awareness. Although the Act was enacted in 1996, a large number of people residing in Fifth Schedule regions remain unaware of its provisions or the rights granted to them. Many Gram Sabhas do not know they have the power to approve or disapprove mining, land acquisition, or forest use, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation by companies and agencies that hide information.

Conflicting laws and local power structures

PESA sometimes conflicts with other laws such as the Forest Rights Act and Wildlife Protection Act, creating confusion. Additionally, local organizations are often controlled by non-tribal people, which curtails the decision-making authority of tribal community members. This undermines PESA’s fundamental goal of giving voice and power to tribal people for self-governance.

Paths forward for effective implementation

To realize PESA’s promise, several measures are essential. First, all tribal states must expeditiously frame PESA rules and implement them genuinely. The central government should provide model rules while respecting state variations for local contexts.

Second, massive awareness campaigns are needed to educate tribal communities about their rights under PESA. Civil society organizations and government agencies must work together to ensure Gram Sabha members understand their powers and how to exercise them effectively.

Third, capacity building programs should be established to train Gram Sabha members in planning, resource management, and governance. This includes providing necessary infrastructure, financial support, and technical assistance.

Fourth, convergence with other protective legislation is crucial. The provisions of PESA should be integrated with the Forest Rights Act and the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act to create a comprehensive framework protecting tribal rights.

Finally, strong monitoring and grievance redressal mechanisms must be put in place, with clear consequences for violations. State governments should establish PESA cells to monitor implementation and provide support to Gram Sabhas.

What do you think? Can PESA truly transform tribal self-governance if implemented in letter and spirit? How can we ensure that bureaucratic structures genuinely devolve power to Gram Sabhas rather than merely paying lip service to the Act’s provisions?

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

References
  1. https://www.nextias.com/blog/pesa-act-1996/
  2. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-news-analysis/panchayat-extension-to-scheduled-areas-pesa-act-1996
  3. https://www.pmfias.com/pesa/
  4. https://www.mha.gov.in/sites/default/files/PESAAct1996_0.pdf
  5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388970373_A_STUDY_ON_CHALLENGES_AND_SUCCESSES_OF_PESA_ACT_IMPLEMENTATION_IN_RAJASTHAN
  6. https://cjp.org.in/pesa-act-origins-workings-and-challenges/
  7. https://www.impriindia.com/insights/panchayat-extension-scheduled-area-act/

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Gender and Governance

1 Concepts and Context

  1. Defining Governance
  2. What is Good Governance
  3. Gender and Governance

2 Impact of Gender Inequality on Governance

  1. Inequality-Equality Conundrum
  2. Social and Cultural Inequality
  3. Inequality of Resources/Gender Gap Index
  4. Inequality of Work and Wages
  5. The Question of Representation
  6. Class-Caste-Gender Intersectionality

3 Locating Gender in Governance Discourse

  1. Contextualising Gender
  2. Understanding Governance: Concept
  3. Changing Paradigms of Governance
  4. Engendering Curriculum
  5. Engendering Private Sector
  6. Engendering Civil Society
  7. Engendering Public Sector and Polity

4 Historical Background of Local Governments in India

  1. Historical Overview
  2. Post-independence Developments
  3. Brief Overview of Initiatives Post-Independence
  4. Post-Independence Panchayati Raj Institutions

5 Committees Constituted by Government of India- Initiatives Taken by the State Government

  1. Balwantrai Mehta Committee
  2. Ashok Mehta Committee
  3. G.V.K. Rao Committee
  4. L.M. Singhvi Committee
  5. Initiatives Taken by the State Government

6 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts

  1. Contending Notion of Gram Swaraj
  2. 73rd and 74th Amendment Acts
  3. Mis(representation) of Women โ€“ Case of Mukhiyapatis
  4. Deepening Democracy: Understanding PESA
  5. Challenges or Opportunities

7 Changemakers at Grassroots and Problems faced by women in Grassroots Governance

  1. Role of Changemakers
  2. Setting the Context
  3. Women Changemakers at the Grassroots
  4. Challenges Faced by Women in Grassroots Governance

8 Women in Legislatures

  1. History of Legislatures
  2. Role of Women in Legislatures
  3. Question of Representation
  4. Problems Faced by Women Representatives

9 Comparative Best Practices

  1. Moldova
  2. Germany
  3. France
  4. India
  5. United States of America
  6. Australian Local Government Womenโ€™s Association

10 Legal Literacy and Leadership

  1. Basic Premises
  2. Debates on Legal Literacy
  3. Socio-Legal Understanding in Relation to Legal Literacy
  4. World of Legal Literacy Education
  5. Challenges Before Legal Literacy

11 Globalization and Post Globalization Phase

  1. Understanding Globalization
  2. Characteristics of Globalization
  3. Gender and Globalization
  4. Understanding Post-Globalization
  5. Gender and Post-Globalization

12 Labour force Participation in the Key Sectors

  1. Definitions
  2. Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS)
  3. Female Labour Force Participation
  4. Labour Market and Women
  5. New Initiatives

13 Changing Nature of Occupational Association

  1. Occupational Association and Economic Development
  2. Changes in Occupational Association in India
  3. Gender Scenario
  4. Female Labour Force Participation Rate
  5. Reasons for Falling FLFPR
  6. Policy Options

14 Challenges to the Informal Sector in India

  1. Informal Sector in India
  2. Women in the Informal Sector
  3. Issues faced by Women in the Informal Sector
  4. New Initiatives on Part of the Judiciary
  5. Sex Work

15 Criminal Justice System

  1. Law, Police and the Courts
  2. Criminal Laws
  3. Criminal Courts
  4. Trial Procedure
  5. Women and Criminal Justice System

16 Access to Justice

  1. Idea of Justice
  2. People and Access Justice
  3. Gender and Access to Justice
  4. Sexual Harassment and Challenges Before Women

17 Women Lawyers

  1. Perspectives on the Social Character of Professions
  2. Gender and Legal Profession
  3. Women and Law: Trajectories of Scholarship and Activism

18 Judicial Reforms

  1. Police Reforms
  2. Role of Lawyers
  3. Judicial Reforms and Training the Judges
  4. Women Centric Judicial Reforms

19 Women in Conflict with Law

  1. Understanding the specificities of Women in Conflict with Law
  2. Gendered Experiences of the Criminal Justice System
  3. Criminal Justice Reform: What can be done?
  4. Conflict Perspective on Women in Conflict with Law