The Role of NGOs and Voluntary Organizations in Supporting Self-Help Groups

In most rural and low-income communities across India, women have historically been excluded from formal financial systems. They lacked access to credit, had little say in household decisions, and operated largely outside any structured economic support. Self-Help Groups (SHGs) began changing that – but they didn’t emerge in a vacuum. Behind the formation, growth, and sustainability of most SHGs is a crucial force: Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and voluntary organizations (VOs). These bodies do far more than initiate a group and step back. They serve as architects, educators, connectors, and long-term allies in a process that transforms not just individual women, but entire communities.

What voluntary organizations actually do for SHGs 🔗

Before understanding their specific roles, it helps to be clear on what an SHG is and why external support is necessary in the first place. An SHG is typically a small voluntary group of 10 to 20 individuals, usually from similar socio-economic backgrounds, who come together to save regularly, pool resources, and provide each other with small loans. The model is built on mutual trust and collective discipline. But in communities with low literacy, little financial knowledge, and deep-rooted social hierarchies, the idea of managing group funds or standing up to local moneylenders doesn’t come naturally overnight. That’s exactly where NGOs step in.

NGOs have been the main innovators in microfinance in India, and their flexibility outside rigid government structures has allowed them to develop simplified processes suited to resource-poor contexts. Organizations like SEWA (Self-Employed Women’s Association), MYRADA, PRADAN, and DHAN Foundation are among the pioneering voluntary bodies that have promoted SHGs focused on income generation using local skills. Their work laid the practical foundation for what later became a nationwide SHG movement.

Supporting formation and management of SHGs 🔗

The earliest and most fundamental role of a voluntary organization is to identify communities where an SHG can make a difference and then build the conditions for it to function. This sounds straightforward, but in practice it involves a great deal of groundwork.

Community mobilization and trust-building 🔗

NGOs begin by conducting awareness campaigns in target communities, mobilizing individuals interested in creating SHGs and encouraging cooperation by raising awareness of the potential advantages of teamwork. This is not just about informing people – it’s about convincing women who have never managed formal finances that they are capable of doing so. In regions where patriarchal norms discourage women from participating in public or financial life, this initial mobilization is often the hardest step.

Once interest is established, NGOs guide the group through formation – helping members select officers such as a president, secretary, and treasurer, and setting internal rules and norms that emphasize shared accountability. The VO essentially acts as the anchor that brings a group from an informal gathering of neighbors into a structured, functioning collective.

Establishing internal systems and group discipline 🔗

After formation, NGOs help SHGs put in place the basic operational systems that keep them running smoothly. This includes setting up regular meeting schedules, establishing record-keeping practices, and creating transparent processes for loan disbursement and repayment. Capacity building training for SHG members covers various aspects such as financial literacy, record-keeping, and group dynamics, and is often facilitated by NGOs or government agencies. Without this foundational infrastructure, many groups would collapse under internal disputes or mismanagement in their early months.

NGOs also assist with conflict resolution when disagreements arise among members – a common challenge given that group cohesion depends heavily on interpersonal trust. By providing a neutral third party and structured mediation, voluntary organizations help groups survive the difficulties that often derail early-stage collectives.

Linking SHGs with banks and government schemes 🔗

One of the most concrete contributions VOs make is connecting SHGs with formal financial institutions. Many SHG members have never held a bank account. NGOs guide them through the process of opening group savings accounts, understanding banking procedures, and eventually applying for credit under programs like NABARD’s SHG-Bank Linkage Programme (SBLP), launched in 1992, which bridged the gap between formal financial institutions and the unbanked rural population. This linkage is critical – without it, SHG savings remain limited to what members can pool themselves, capping how much economic activity the group can support.

Beyond banking, NGOs also connect SHGs to relevant government schemes, subsidies, and livelihood programs, helping groups access resources they would otherwise not know existed or be unable to navigate on their own.

Providing training and capacity building 🔗

Training is arguably the most transformative contribution that voluntary organizations make to SHG development. It is what shifts members from passively participating in a savings circle to actively managing and growing a financial institution of their own.

Financial literacy and credit management 🔗

The majority of women who join SHGs in rural and semi-urban areas have had little or no exposure to formal financial concepts. NGOs address this through structured financial literacy programs that cover how interest rates work, how to read and maintain account books, how to assess creditworthiness, and how to plan loan repayments. The World Bank and UNDP both recognize financial literacy as a key driver of economic empowerment and poverty alleviation, and NGOs working with SHGs have long put this into practice at the grassroots level.

This kind of training is particularly important because poor financial management is one of the leading reasons SHGs fail. When members understand how to track income and expenditure, how to calculate interest, and how to make collective lending decisions responsibly, the group becomes far more sustainable over time.

Leadership and decision-making skills 🔗

Beyond finance, NGOs build the leadership capacity of SHG members – especially important in communities where women are rarely encouraged to take on public roles. Training in democratic decision-making, communication, and group governance equips members to run meetings effectively, resolve disputes, and advocate for the group’s interests when interacting with banks, government officials, or market intermediaries.

Microfinance empowers women by bringing about transformative changes in household decision-making and enhancing their bargaining power – and this shift is rarely accidental. It is the product of deliberate capacity-building work by VOs that create the conditions for women to develop confidence alongside financial skills.

Vocational and entrepreneurial training 🔗

Many NGOs extend their training programs beyond financial management into vocational and entrepreneurship development. SHGs often organize training programs and workshops to enhance the skills and knowledge of their members in areas such as entrepreneurship, agriculture, health, and education. Organizations like SEWA, for instance, provided women in Ahmedabad with tailoring skills that turned them into skilled entrepreneurs with sustainable livelihoods – a direct outcome of VO-led training embedded within the SHG model.

This kind of skills training matters because access to credit alone does not create economic change. A woman who borrows money but doesn’t know how to use it productively for an income-generating activity is unlikely to repay the loan or improve her household’s financial position. VOs recognize this and build training programs that address the entire value chain from savings to business operation.

Evolving from initiator to advisor 🔗

As an SHG matures, the role of the NGO naturally shifts. Rather than driving day-to-day operations, the VO steps back and takes on a more advisory function – offering strategic guidance on operational improvements, advanced record-keeping, and governance. This transition is intentional and important: SHGs sometimes become overly reliant on government or NGOs for funding and guidance, which undermines their long-term autonomy. Good voluntary organizations design their support to phase out gradually, building self-sufficiency rather than dependency.

Economic and social impacts of VOs on SHGs 🔗

The question of whether VO support actually makes a measurable difference has been studied extensively – and the evidence points clearly in one direction. When voluntary organizations are actively involved in SHG development, the outcomes for members and communities are substantially better across both economic and social dimensions.

Economic self-reliance and financial inclusion 🔗

Experienced NGOs, alongside broad support from NABARD and state administration, have been identified as key factors behind the significant growth of SHGs in regions like South India. This growth has translated into real financial outcomes: members gain access to collateral-free credit, start small enterprises, reduce their dependence on predatory moneylenders, and build household savings for the first time.

Research in Tamil Nadu has shown a clear shift in women’s roles after SHG formation – from being predominantly homemakers to becoming active participants in revenue-generating businesses and community-building efforts. This shift is not spontaneous. It is enabled by the organizational infrastructure, training, and bank linkages that VOs put in place.

The scale of this impact is significant nationally. More than 140 million families are covered by the SHG-Bank Linkage Programme, and the cumulative savings and credit flows through SHGs run into hundreds of thousands of crores of rupees. Behind much of this growth is the sustained effort of voluntary organizations that created the ecosystem in which SHGs could thrive.

Social cohesion and community change 🔗

The impact of VOs on SHGs extends well beyond economics. Women brought together by common economic goals form strong bonds through regular meetings, discussions, and collaborative initiatives – a sense of community that fosters support networks, boosting morale and resilience. SHG members begin to discuss issues beyond finances: health, domestic violence, child marriage, sanitation, and education. The group meeting becomes a space for social deliberation and collective action.

NGOs actively encourage this broader engagement. By running awareness programs on gender rights, health, and legal entitlements alongside financial training, VOs transform SHGs into platforms for social change – not just savings clubs. SHGs help eradicate many social issues such as dowry, alcoholism, and early marriage, and act as pressure groups through which pressure can be mounted on the government to act on important issues.

Women’s voice and leadership in communities 🔗

SHG participation has substantially empowered women across various domains, including increasing financial independence, enhancing participation in decision-making processes, fostering social networks, and boosting self-confidence and well-being. These changes ripple outward – women who gain confidence within an SHG setting often become more active in village governance, more willing to challenge discriminatory practices, and more capable of advocating for their families’ needs.

This leadership transformation doesn’t happen on its own. It is built deliberately through the capacity-building programs, organizational structures, and ongoing mentorship that voluntary organizations provide. The VO doesn’t just help a group of women save money – it helps them become agents of change in their own communities.

The limits and responsibilities of VO involvement 🔗

While the contributions of NGOs to SHG development are substantial, it’s important to acknowledge that VO involvement is not without risks. Over-dependence on external organizations is a real challenge. When VOs withdraw funding or support without adequately preparing groups for independence, SHGs can struggle to sustain themselves. This is why the best voluntary organizations design for exit from the beginning – building internal leadership, linking groups to formal institutions, and creating federations that allow SHGs to support each other beyond individual VO involvement.

There is also the question of quality. Not all NGOs operate with the same level of expertise or accountability. The effectiveness of a VO’s contribution depends heavily on the skills of its field workers, the relevance of its training content, and the depth of its community relationships. Partnerships with NGOs and government initiatives have enhanced SHG operations, increasingly incorporating technology for better outreach and management – but this requires ongoing investment in VO capacity, not just SHG capacity.

At their best, voluntary organizations don’t position themselves as permanent fixtures in an SHG’s life. They function as catalysts – accelerating a process of self-organization that communities themselves then own and sustain. The measure of a VO’s success is not how long it remains involved, but how capable the SHG becomes in its absence.

What do you think? Given that voluntary organizations play such a central role in shaping whether an SHG succeeds or struggles, how should accountability and quality standards for NGOs working with SHGs be structured? And as SHGs evolve and mature, at what point – if ever – does continued VO involvement become a barrier to genuine community self-reliance?

References

1. https://www.indiafarm.org/gov-policies-schemes/self-help-groups-shgs-india/
2. https://ncwapps.nic.in/pdfReports/SHG-Delhi.pdf
3. https://give.do/discover/news/empowerment-through-unity-self-help-groups-in-india/
4. https://agriculture.institute/cooperative-and-farmers-organizations/self-help-groups-rural-development/
5. https://www.fundsforngos.org/all-proposals/a-sample-grant-proposal-on-financial-literacy-and-microenterprise-development-for-shgs/
6. https://innovation-entrepreneurship.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13731-024-00419-y
7. https://www.nextias.com/blog/self-help-groups-shgs/
8. https://academic.oup.com/cdj/article/58/2/283/6374653
9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378967153_Role_of_Self-Help_Group_in_Women_Empowerment_in_India
10. https://fightclubias.com/self-help-group-history-functions-benefits-case-studies-examples/
11. https://www.atishmathur.com/gov-social-issues/self-help-groups
12. https://www.upliftlivefoundation.org/post/understanding-the-transformative-role-of-self-help-groups-in-india-s-socio-economic-landscape