Top Activities SHG Networks Undertake to Support Members

A Self-Help Group (SHG) on its own is a powerful unit – a small circle of women pooling savings, extending loans to each other, and building financial discipline from the ground up. But a single SHG, however well-run, has limits. It can only do so much when it comes to accessing bank loans, influencing policy, or keeping members informed about government schemes. That’s where the SHG network comes in. Networks – federations, apex bodies, and umbrella organizations – perform a distinct and critical set of activities that multiply what individual groups can achieve. This post breaks down the three core activities that SHG networks undertake to support their member groups.

Financial linkages and resource access 🔗

One of the most consequential things an SHG network does is connect member groups to formal financial institutions and government welfare schemes – something most individual SHGs cannot do alone. This is called financial linkage, and it sits at the heart of what makes networks indispensable.

In practical terms, this means the network acts as a bridge. It helps SHGs open bank accounts, qualify for collateral-free loans, and become eligible for government credit programs. NABARD’s SHG-Bank Linkage Programme (SHG-BLP), launched in 1992, is the world’s largest coordinated financial inclusion program and now covers close to 100 million households in India. While NABARD operates at the national level, it is networks and federations on the ground that do the actual work of facilitating this linkage – helping SHGs build the savings records and documentation that banks require.

How networks negotiate better terms 🔗

Individual SHGs rarely have the bargaining power to negotiate loan terms or secure revolving funds from government programs. Networks aggregate the collective weight of dozens or hundreds of groups. Research on SEWA’s approach shows that each SEWA Federation facilitates linkages to local markets, assists member SHGs in applying for governmental schemes and subsidies, and negotiates with input suppliers to secure lower prices for members’ products. This aggregated bargaining simply is not possible at the individual SHG level.

Networks also help SHGs tap into specific government schemes – from the National Rural Livelihoods Mission (NRLM), which covers 100 million families, to Pradhan Mantri MUDRA Yojana, which provides loans to micro-enterprises including SHGs. Getting an individual SHG enrolled in these schemes often requires paperwork, coordination with government offices, and follow-up that a network can handle far more efficiently than any single group.

Revolving funds and insurance access 🔗

Networks also work to ensure member SHGs receive revolving funds – pooled capital that moves through the network and can be lent out repeatedly. Research published in the Community Development Journal highlights that NGOs and network organizations nurture, support, and train SHGs to start income-generating activities after groups demonstrate financial discipline through bookkeeping. Networks similarly help SHG members access group-mode insurance products, which are substantially cheaper than individual policies – another financial benefit that only becomes available at scale.

Training and capacity building 🔗

Access to finance means very little if group members don’t know how to manage it. That’s why training and capacity building is a central, ongoing activity of SHG networks – not a one-time event, but a continuous support function.

Training programs cover a wide range of skills: financial literacy, group management, bookkeeping, business development, and leadership. Networks organize these programs because they have the scale to bring in qualified trainers, develop materials, and run sessions across multiple SHGs simultaneously. Individual groups simply cannot afford to organize this kind of training infrastructure on their own.

What the training covers 🔗

Financial literacy is typically the starting point. Members learn how to read and maintain account books, understand interest rates, and track income and expenditure. This is critical because banks use SHG bookkeeping records as a form of collateral – the group’s documented savings history and loan repayment discipline substitute for the physical assets that most members don’t have. Without proper record-keeping, SHGs cannot qualify for credit linkage.

Group management training addresses how to run effective meetings, manage internal conflicts, rotate leadership, and maintain democratic decision-making within the group. These skills directly affect cohesion and longevity. SHG federations act somewhat like holding companies for their member micro-businesses, providing overall structure, capacity, advocacy, and access to partnerships – but this only works when individual groups are well-managed.

Livelihood and enterprise skills training goes a step further. NABARD’s Livelihood and Enterprise Development Programme (LEDP), launched in 2015, operates through cluster-level implementation covering 15 to 30 SHGs at a time, providing intensive skill-building covering agricultural activities as well as off-farm rural sectors, followed by refresher training and forward-backward market linkages. Networks are the implementing vehicle for programs like this at the community level.

SEWA’s integrated training model 🔗

SEWA (Self-Employed Women’s Association), founded in 1972 by Ela Bhatt, is one of the most studied examples of a network that puts capacity building at the center of its operations. SEWA works with members across over 125 different trades and has organized its members into more than 4,800 SHGs, 160 cooperatives, and 15 economic federations. Its training strategy builds skills in financial literacy, business management, market assessment, agricultural techniques, and alternative livelihood generation – delivered in an integrated way rather than as disconnected workshops. The goal, as documented in FAO research on SEWA’s model, is to gradually move members from dependence on the network to autonomous, self-reliant economic decision-making.

This kind of structured, multi-level training is only possible because SEWA operates as a network. The scale allows training costs to be spread across thousands of members; the organizational depth allows trainers to understand local context and adjust content accordingly.

Information dissemination and advocacy 🔗

The third major activity of SHG networks is one that often gets less attention than finance and training but is equally important: keeping members informed and advocating collectively on their behalf. This is the function that turns a collection of small groups into a movement with a voice.

How information flows through the network 🔗

Information dissemination refers to the deliberate sharing of relevant updates with member SHGs. This includes new government schemes members may be eligible for, changes in banking procedures, updates on market prices, health or welfare program announcements, and legal rights relevant to informal workers. Networks use newsletters, regular meetings, community radio, mobile messages, and digital platforms to push this information down to the group level.

Without this function, individual SHGs are at a serious disadvantage. Members living in rural or remote areas often have no way to learn about a new credit scheme or a change in subsidy eligibility until it is too late to benefit from it. The network’s information dissemination role directly plugs this gap. NABARD’s E-Shakti project, for instance, uses digital platforms to improve record-keeping, communication, and access to markets for SHGs – an initiative that networks help roll out at the village level.

Collective advocacy for member concerns 🔗

Advocacy is the network’s external-facing function – using the collective voice of member SHGs to push for policy changes, better services, or fairer treatment. Because networks aggregate large numbers of members, they carry institutional weight that a single group of 15 women cannot.

SEWA is again an instructive example. The organization has for decades used its membership base to advocate on issues ranging from minimum wages for informal workers to social security protections and maternity benefits. SEWA’s advocacy work has promoted financial inclusion in Ahmedabad by challenging discriminatory barriers to formal banking access, pushing for women to gain access to credit and banking services that they were previously excluded from.

At the local level, advocacy often takes a more immediate form: networks raise concerns directly with block-level or district-level government officials on behalf of member groups. This could mean pressing for faster loan disbursement, flagging harassment from informal moneylenders, or demanding that local banks simplify account-opening procedures for SHG members. The SHG-Bank Linkage Programme research emphasizes that this kind of grassroots political participation has become one of the program’s significant development outcomes – not just an incidental benefit.

Meetings as structured advocacy spaces 🔗

Periodic network meetings – cluster meetings, federation-level gatherings, or annual conventions – serve a dual purpose. They are information-sharing events, but they are also spaces where members collectively identify concerns, frame them as shared issues, and decide on collective action. This is how networks convert individual grievances into organized advocacy positions. Studies on SHG functioning note that SHGs have given a voice to otherwise underrepresented groups in society – and it is the network structure, with its regular meeting rhythms and organized communication channels, that makes this possible consistently rather than sporadically.

Advocacy also reinforces the other two activities. When networks successfully lobby for simplified bank procedures, it makes financial linkage easier for member SHGs. When they push for training grants from government programs, it expands the scope of capacity building. The three activities – financial linkage, training, and information and advocacy – are not separate tracks; they reinforce each other continuously.

Why these activities matter together 🔗

Taken individually, each of these three activities adds value. Together, they constitute a comprehensive support ecosystem. Financial linkage ensures SHGs have access to the capital they need to function and grow. Training ensures members have the skills to use that capital productively and manage their groups effectively. Information dissemination and advocacy ensure members stay informed and that their collective interests are represented where decisions about their lives are made.

The experience of networks like SEWA, MYRADA, and state-level federations under NRLM consistently shows that SHGs embedded in active, well-functioning networks outperform isolated groups on almost every measure – loan repayment rates, savings accumulation, member retention, and livelihood improvement. The network is not a bureaucratic layer above the SHG; it is the support infrastructure that allows individual groups to reach their potential.

For women in rural and semi-urban areas with limited access to formal financial systems, limited education, and limited political representation, SHG networks performing these three functions represent one of the most practical and proven pathways to sustained economic participation and collective agency.

What do you think? Do you think the three activities – financial linkage, training, and advocacy – are equally important for SHG networks, or does one of them matter more at a particular stage of a group’s development? And given that digital tools are now increasingly available even in rural areas, how might technology change the way SHG networks carry out information dissemination and advocacy in the coming years?

References

1. https://www.nabard.org/contentsearch.aspx?AID=225&Key=shg+bank+linkage+programme
2. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/c12f9878-91c3-480d-a22d-82faa19eb134/content
3. https://www.gktoday.in/shg-bank-linkage-programme/
4. https://academic.oup.com/cdj/article/58/2/283/6374653
5. https://www.nextias.com/blog/self-help-groups-shgs/
6. https://imagogg.org/ideas-and-insights/scaling-self-help-groups-in-india-can-impact-investing-help/
7. https://www.sewa.org/about-us/
8. https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/self-help-groups-7
9. https://fightclubias.com/self-help-group-history-functions-benefits-case-studies-examples/
10. https://prepp.in/news/e-492-self-help-group-indian-polity-upsc-notes
11. https://www.civilsdaily.com/self-help-groups/